Security

Security Policy & Responsible Disclosure

Last updated: 19 July 2026  ·  Applies to: VaultMorph AI Shield desktop app, browser extension, Security Workspace, api.vaultmorph.org, and vaultmorph.org

Contents

  1. Scope
  2. How to report a vulnerability
  3. Disclosure process & timeline
  4. Severity classification
  5. Safe harbor
  6. Out-of-scope issues
  7. Security architecture summary
  8. Hall of fame

1. Scope

This policy applies to security vulnerabilities discovered in:

Security is central to VaultMorph AI Shield's purpose. The entire product exists to protect your secrets — so we take our own security very seriously. We welcome responsible disclosure from the security community.

2. How to report a vulnerability

Email (preferred)

Send your report to contact@vaultmorph.org with the subject line:
"[SECURITY] Brief description of the issue"

Please include:

GitHub Security Advisory (alternative)

You may also file a private GitHub Security Advisory for confidential disclosure without public disclosure. GitHub keeps these private until we coordinate a fix and publish the advisory together.

Please do not open a public GitHub Issue for security vulnerabilities. Use the private advisory or email above. Public disclosure before a fix is available puts users at risk.

3. Disclosure process & timeline

StageTimeline
Acknowledgement of your reportWithin 48 hours
Initial triage and severity classificationWithin 5 business days
Confirmation of validity (or explanation if not valid)Within 10 business days
Patch development and testingDepends on severity (see below)
Coordinated public disclosureAfter patch is available; we will agree a date with you

Target remediation timelines by severity

SeverityTarget patch timeline
Critical72 hours (emergency patch)
High7 days
Medium30 days
LowNext scheduled release (≤90 days)

We follow a coordinated disclosure model. We ask that you give us a reasonable amount of time to address the issue before any public disclosure. In return, we commit to the timelines above and will keep you informed throughout.

4. Severity classification (CVSS-inspired)

SeverityExamples
Critical Remote code execution; exfiltration of raw secrets or API keys from the application; bypass of all sanitization allowing secrets to reach AI providers unmasked; license signing key compromise
High Local privilege escalation; bypass of license verification without license key; partial sanitization bypass for a specific secret type; injection into signed rule packs
Medium Information disclosure of non-sensitive metadata; persistent XSS in the WebView rendering; denial-of-service of the license server
Low Minor information leaks; low-impact UI spoofing; non-exploitable crash

5. Safe harbor

VaultMorph will not take legal action against researchers who:

We consider good-faith security research to be a valuable contribution to the safety of our users and will treat researchers accordingly.

6. Out-of-scope issues

The following are generally out of scope and will not be treated as security vulnerabilities:

7. Security architecture summary

For context when evaluating findings, here is a summary of our security design:

On-device (all editions)

Security Workspace (code review / SAST)

MCP Server trust gate

Two transports are supported; each has distinct trust controls.

HTTP transport (loopback)

stdio transport (local process)

Both transports

Browser Extension

Artifact sandbox

Subscription providers (Claude Code & ChatGPT Codex CLI)

Azure OpenAI provider

Knowledge Base (RAG)

Voice Input

License server (api.vaultmorph.org)

8. Hall of fame

We are grateful to the following researchers who have responsibly disclosed security issues to us:

No submissions yet — be the first! We recognise all valid reports here (with your permission).